0
General

Polish controller finds weaknesses in data retention rules

Wednesday 9 October 2013 | 15:58 CET | News
Data retention provisions in Poland do not sufficiently protect privacy and freedom of citizens against excessive interference of the state, according to findings of the Polish Supreme Control Authority (NIK). In Poland there is no independent body verifying the legitimacy of acquiring and usage of billing information. 

The NIK evaluated positively, despite the irregularities, the activity of controlled bodies, services and systems in terms of procedures for the collection and processing of data retention (retained by telecommunications operators identifying information about the owner of a phone number, phone numbers called, phone number owner's location and the location of the owner of an IP address), reports Media2.pl. Rules and procedures in place enable efficient retrieval of data. Authorized employees and officers have access to data, and the circle of persons having such authority was clearly defined in controlled institutions. 

The irregularities found concerned insufficient identification of an authorized officer when requesting data on communication (lacking detail in contracts with operators); requesting data beyond the data retention period (until January 2013 it was 24 months, currently it is 12 months); requesting billing data in divorce proceedings without subscriber's consent (which operators refused to provide to courts); acquiring data beyond the scope defined in the court's decision which was a violation of telecommunications secret by operators (NIK informed the regulator UKE on such cases); not removing redundant data; acquiring data by non-authorised or non-authenticated persons; requesting SMS content by courts in civil proceedings and not informing citizens of courts and prosecutors acquiring billing information. 

NIK recognized that data retention is a valuable tool for law enforcement and criminal justice matters. The findings of NIK, however, show that the current Polish regulations on obtaining phone records do not protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens against undue state interference.


Categories: General
Countries: Poland
::: add a comment

Add comment

We welcome comments that add value to the discussion. We attempt to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam, and our editors frequently review the comments to ensure they are appropriate. If you see a comment that you believe is inappropriate to the discussion, you can bring it to our attention by using the report abuse links. As the comments are written and submitted by visitors of the Telecompaper website, they in no way represent the opinion of Telecompaper.






60%
of Dutch Mobile customers prefer phone for contact with provider
Netherlands  |  july 2014

Calendar   /   Industry Events

23 Oct Telenet Q3 2014
23 Oct Tele2 Q3 2014
23 Oct Rogers Communications Q3 2014
23 Oct Telekom Austria Q3 2014
23 Oct America Movil Q3 2014
23 Oct Orange Q3 2014
23 Oct Sonus Networks Q3 2014
23 Oct Sequans Communications Q2 2014
23 Oct Altera Q3 2014
23 Oct Nokia Q3 2014
23 Oct ADVA Optical Networking Q3 2014
23 Oct Synaptics Q3 2014
23 Oct Microsoft Q1 FY 2014/15
23 Oct Comcast Q3 2014
23 Oct Ingram Micro Q3 2014
23 Oct Amazon.com Q3 2014
23 Oct Netgear Q3 2014
23 Oct ShoreTel Q1 FY 2014/15
23 Oct 2nd Enterprise Mobility China Summit 2014
24 Oct DNA Q3 2014
24 Oct Belgacom Q3 2014
27 Oct Ooredoo Q3 2014
27 Oct PMC-Sierra Q3 2014
27 Oct Twitter Q3 2014
27 Oct Meru Networks Q3 2014
27 Oct Net Insight Q3 2014
27 Oct Telecoms Social Network Summit
28 Oct Internap Q3 2014
28 Oct Extreme Networks fiscal Q1
28 Oct Synchronoss Q3 2014
::: More Calendar Items