Moreover, ”time to market” and “boosting innovation” have probably become obsolete buzzwords by now, as the new term “fail fast” has been adopted from the realm of over-the-top players (OTTs) such as Google, Apple and the like. Adoption of this term reflects the idea that communication service providers (CSPs) need to trans-form their “legacy” mindset and reprogram their DNA according to the templates that have proved successful for the OTTs. “Fail fast” is by no means about failure per se, instead – it reflects a model that builds failure into the overall framework of success. “Fail fast” in fact means the ability to experiment with new services, to find out what works for customers and what doesn’t, and to identify what requires fine-tuning in order to raise excitement in the customers. The key, therefore, is to be able to put new ideas to the test quickly and without being afraid of suffering huge costs if they don’t work.
So how does the “fail fast” concept relate to NFV/SDN? The first expectation arises from the fact that SDN/NFV simplification is about “softwarisation” of the network, so, if your network is software-based, you may be able to replicate the success of software giants such as Google. However, you need to remember that having some-thing based on software does not guarantee the “for free” ability to reduce the life cycle of a software-based series. To make that dream come true, you need model-driven orchestration and life-cycle management when adopting NFV/SDN technology. These two are closely related, as model-driven orchestration enables you to define a model for new services, which means that you can quickly put such services to the test. These two concepts are elaborated further on in this text.
Industry Sources content is provided by third-party clients and does not represent the opinions of Telecompaper.
Every day we send out a free e-mail with the most important headlines of the last 24 hours.
We welcome comments that add value to the discussion. We attempt to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam, and our editors frequently review the comments to ensure they are appropriate. If you see a comment that you believe is inappropriate to the discussion, you can bring it to our attention by using the report abuse links. As the comments are written and submitted by visitors of the Telecompaper website, they in no way represent the opinion of Telecompaper.
We have been keeping professionals in the telecoms industry up-to-date since 2000. Telecompaper is a well respected, independent research and publishing company focussed on the telecommunications industry.
3995 AA Houten
Phone: +31 30 6349600
Fax: +31 30 6349699
© 2000 - 2017 Telecom.paper BV. All rights reserved.
Telecompaper is a trademark of Telecom.paper BV. No part of this site can be reproduced without
the expressed permission of Telecom.paper BV. Our General Terms and Conditions can be found here.
Terms and Conditions