KPN to reap the benefits of NSN's new IPTV platform

Commentary Broadband Netherlands 24 MRT 2010
KPN to reap the benefits of NSN's new IPTV platform

Nokia Siemens Networks presented a new IPTV platform at the IPTV World Forum in London. The system opens up the possibilities for input and output, going beyond just live TV to support recorded content, VoD and catch-up TV. Consumption is also no longer limited to the TV set, but can also occur on a computer or mobile phone. Additional advantages of the new platform are open development, the ability for operators to send personalised messages to subscribers, quicker channel changing and improved image quality.

The new NSN system seems to answer directly to KPN's Fiber Update in December, although KPN is of course just one customer for the equipment maker. Feedback on the TV over FTTH service showed two problems: slow channel changing and the lack of BBC 1 and 2. It was also announced then that NSN was busy improving the platform.

It's not surprising then that the new NSN platform solves the problem mentioned by KPN of slow channel changing. Is channel changing even that important in the digital world? Users have a better choice of content and less need to 'channel surf' to find something to watch. Digital offers acces to more, and on-demand, content, as well as electronic programme guides where users can quickly find and go directly to the channel they want.

NSN can't solve the BBC problem, and this is a major hole in KPN's TV package versus offerings from cable operators and the TV package at Glashart Media (previously Hertzinger). This subsidiary of Reggefiber FTTH (in which KPN has a 41 percent stake) offers a TV package for Reggefiber's services providers, XMS and Edutel. KPN is at a disadvantage to these service providers, although they still have a very small market share.

Success on the TV market is crucial for KPN. Triple-play is a clear success on the Dutch market, and the cable operators have already taken the lead. Not only do they have a good TV/video product, they also offer the fastest broadband. It's important for KPN to present a strong triple-play offering, which preferably competes on more than price. KPN can only compete with cable on the broadband market in areas where it offers FTTH. Elsehwere, it's relying on VDSL2, which is inferior to Docsis 3.0. At the Fiber Update presentation, KPN appeared skeptical over whether it can compete on the basis of content, as in principle all players can buy in the same programming. Still, there are some possibilities, and a first-mover advantage will be important as cable increasingly overtakes the DSL market. The ingredients are a plentiful VoD catalogue and access to over-the-top content.

Whatever the case, KPN should be happy with the improvements that NSN has made. The quality is improving (although KPN did not receive any complaints about this in the tests last year) and the service possibilities are increasing. The introduction of operator-to-subscriber messaging is clearly just the start of all the new applications that digital TV can deliver, such as targeted advertising. This will make TV truly interactive, unlike what operators such as KPN and Ziggo currently try to market as interactive. To date, interaction is largely limited to a touch of the remote control to select a programme or vote for a candidate in a game show.

NSN's new system will also deliver cost savings. KPN has chosen to no longer use the second fibre in FTTH, which is deployed as standard by Reggefiber for analogue TV. The Dutch operator is focusing entirely on digital TV, and as a result multi-room customers must be offered a second set-top box or Digitenne subscription. KPN apparently sees the IPTV platform as NSN envisages: ‘Nokia Siemens promises TV on any screen’. This multi-screen approach is not new, but it will work out well for KPN that NSN is not only its partner for IPTV (both over FTTH and ADSL2+ and soon VDSL2), but also for mobile TV (over DVB-H) and digital terrestrial TV (over DVB-T: Digitenne). This will generate efficiencies and synergies and also allow for new services. It can't be long then before KPN comes with a quad-play offer, adding mobile telephony to the triple-play.

Related Articles

NETHERLANDS 17 FEB 2010

OTT: distribution as a scenario for operators

TV operators have several options for differentiation. In this brief, we focus on differentiation based on the content portfolio. Over-the-top (OTT) is explored as a content source. True integration of broadcast and broadband content could be a logical next step for OTT to evolve towards, which would be of interest to the incumbents on the broadcast market. OTT content is offered through an evolved media player device, which may ultimately become the central home Media Gateway, as a hub between multiple content sources on the one hand, and a variety of screens on the other. OTT is primarily a threat to incumbent broadcast operators, as it migrates viewers away from broadcast TV and at the same time facilitates newcomers to enter the video market. While the threat does not appear massive in the short term, the new generation of internet-enabled boxes does address many of the issues that rendered older versions a typical 'geek' product. Since OTT box manufacturers experience certain difficulties in establishing a strong market foothold, there is an opportunity for them to team up with platform operators. In exchange for a revenue share (or service fee), CATV and IPTV operators could become hardware distribution partners. In our research brief 'Connected TV allows operators to benefit from OTT content' (November 2009) we first explored over-the-top (OTT) content and the consequences it has for TV operators. In this brief we look at the issue from a different angle. We propose a scenario for operators, CATV and IPTV alike, enabling them to benefit from OTT.